Skip to main content

    CONSENT DECREES · September 25, 2026

    Remote Work After Return-to-Office Mandates

    The FedEx matter centered on dispatchers who had worked remotely for nearly three years before individual requests for continued telework were allegedly denied under a return-to-office policy.

    Last reviewed: September 25, 2026

    Return-to-office policies continue to generate accommodation disputes. The 2026 FedEx resolution offers current context, while court decisions show why no universal telework rule fits every job or jurisdiction.

    What the EEOC alleged

    The EEOC alleged that several Manhattan dispatchers had worked remotely successfully for nearly three years before requests to continue were denied under an operational return-to-office approach. The matter settled without a trial finding.

    Prior remote work can be evidence

    Performance reviews, productivity records, job duties performed remotely, changes in operations, and the employer’s stated reasons can help evaluate whether physical presence is essential. Prior telework is relevant evidence, not an automatic entitlement.

    Courts and jobs differ

    The outcome can depend on the federal circuit, actual duties, supervision, teamwork, equipment, customer contact, security, and alternatives. A hybrid schedule or another accommodation may be effective even when full-time telework is not.

    Questions About Disability Discrimination at Work?

    Contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send confidential information until representation is confirmed.